At Blake Lapthorn we want to understand what visitors to our website are browsing to ensure that we continue to produce content that is interesting and of value. We do this using 'cookies', which collect data in an anonymous form and do not contain any sensitive information. Find out more about how we use cookies and how to manage them. Should you continue to use our website, we will assume that you have consented to the use of cookies in accordance with our cookies policy unless you choose to disable the cookies.

review privacy and cookies
view as PDF print

vicarious liability for the acts of a non-employee

Determining a preliminary issue in the case of JGE v English Province of Our Lady of Charity and another, the High Court has held that a diocesan bishop could be held vicariously liable for the torts of a priest of his diocese (who is not an employee).

Vicarious liability places a liability on somebody (party A) for the acts of another person (party B).  It is generally applicable in employment relationships.  However, the High Court ruling makes it clear that a formal employment relationship is not necessary for vicarious liability to apply.

The Court has ruled that in examining whether party A was vicariously responsible for the acts of party B, it is necessary to look carefully at the surrounding facts and circumstances and the full nature of the relationship.  This includes examining the nature and purpose of the relationship, considering whether tools, equipment, uniform or premises were provided to assist the performance of the role, and examining the extent to which party B might reasonably be perceived as having acted on behalf of party A.

On the facts of this case, there was no written contract, no formal supervision, the diocese did not pay the priest and could not dismiss him.  However, the priest was appointed by and on behalf of the diocese in order to do its work and was given training and full authority to undertake the ministry on behalf of the diocese.  On this basis, the Court found that the relationship between the priest and the diocese was a "sufficiently close" relationship to which vicarious liability might attach.

This is the first time that the English courts have been asked to look at vicarious liability in these particular circumstances.  Permission has been granted for appeal to the Court of Appeal.

The decision has potentially wide implications for volunteers and self-employed persons working for charities and other not-for-profit organisations.

If you are concerned about how this decision may affect your organisation, please contact Debbie Sadler, Employment law specialist in our Charities team.

Share:
|More