CIS and CDM: the regulatory double whammy of 2007

 

construction child

 

Certain years stick in the memory: 1066 and 1966 are notable examples. It is no different for the construction industry – 1963, 1980 and 1998 will be forever associated with the JCT contracts (as will, no doubt, 2005 in time).

 

That being the case, 2007 may go down as the year when the industry experienced two seismic events in terms of regulatory changes. You may already be aware that on 6 April this year, the new Construction, Design and Management (CDM) Regulations and Construction Industry Scheme (CIS) both came into force. After a few short months, what are we to make of these new kids on the legislative block?

 

The CDM Regulations apply wherever there is ‘construction work’; in short, the Regulations apply to most building, engineering or civil engineering work. The Regulations place additional duties upon employers, contractors, designers and other defined duty holders on all projects, with additional specific duties on projects lasting more than 30 days or which involve more than 500 person days of construction work. The Health and Safety Executive has taken the view that the new Regulations reflect current best practice. The Regulations are designed to oblige everyone involved on a project to manage health and safety issues from even before work commences on site. However, there is some scepticism in the industry as to whether the Regulations will actually decrease the number of accidents suffered by workers.

 

The new CIS is relevant to the payment of self-employed sub-contractors. Its aim is to prevent tax evasion. Under the Scheme, contractors are now specifically responsible for checking the employment status of sub contractors, who are themselves obliged to register with HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) so that they can be taxed at the appropriate rate. There has been some confusion about whether sub-contractors are deemed to be "employed" in which case the PAYE scheme will apply rather than the CIS. Recent employment case law suggests that HMRC is able to make retrospective assessments of which scheme to apply, which could have significant consequences for contractors.

 

Blake Lapthorn is able to offer advice on the risks of sub-contractors being deemed to be "employees" and how to mitigate those risks.

 

For further information please contact Kevin Barrow on 020 7814 5423 or email kevin.barrow@bllaw.co.uk or Frances Lewis on 020 7814 5495 or email

frances.lewis@bllaw.co.uk

in Issue 6, February 2008...
 

is contractor's cash flow king under the Construction Act?

----

when fixed price means fixed price

----

must we adjudicate?

----

CIS and CDM: the regulatory double whammy of 2007

----

site waste management plans

----

the new Part 36: no payment required!

----

BL Resolve comes of age...

----

Vigil

----

 
download as a pdf
Adobe download icon
 
visit our archive