fixed term staff victory against Lancaster University – a reminder of the rights of employees

The University and College Union's (UCU) success in April 2010 against Lancaster University serves as a real reminder of the protection employees on fixed term contracts receive.

Fixed term contracts are common within the education sector, used frequently to cover a particular course running for a specified period. The Higher Education Statistics Agency found that of the 179,000 staff in higher education in 2008-2009, approximately a third were on fixed term contracts. Such contracts may be necessary in certain situations but given the added protection employees with this status have, the below reflects the importance of ensuring such contracts are only used where there is a real and genuine need to do so.

In this case, an Employment Tribunal found that where fixed term contracts were not renewed, it amounted to a dismissal. As Lancaster University had not followed a fair consultation process in bringing those contracts to an end, only sending a monthly list to the UCU of those contracts due to expire in the following months but not engaging in any meaningful consultation to avoid or reduce the dismissals, it ordered Lancaster University to pay 60 days salary to up to 30 employees whose contracts were not renewed.

This case clarifies and should remind HEIs that whilst an employment contract can be agreed at the outset to be for a fixed period and will terminate at the end of that period without any requirement for notice, the non-renewal of a fixed-term contract at the expiry of its term can be treated as a dismissal for the purpose of a claim for unfair dismissal or, if the position is no longer required, may also entitle the employee to a redundancy payment. As such there still needs to be a fair reason for dismissal and a fair procedure. In the event there are 20 or more employees whose fixed term contracts are coming to an end within 90 days, collective consultation procedures will apply in the event of a redundancy situation, failure to comply with which could result in an award of up to 90 days pay for each affected employee.

In addition to this, employers should also remember that employees engaged on a fixed-term have the right not to be treated less favourably (eg in terms of their remuneration or benefits) than comparable permanent employees simply because they are fixed-term unless it can be objectively justified. Further, fixed-term employees will also usually be deemed permanent where they have been continuously employed for four years or more and are re-engaged again. This can sometimes be so even if there is a break between contracts.

If you would like any further information regarding this article please contact Emma Drew at emma.drew@bllaw.co.uk or T: 023 8085 7436