employment law issues around the misuse of social media

The use of social media is commonplace and, for many, there is a feeling that making comments on social media websites has no restrictions and should not have any adverse consequences as far as the individual's work place is concerned. For others, any member of staff making a comment or recording their activities on a social media site should be taken into account in the context of the individual's employment.

The legal position is not quite as clear cut as either of these approaches might like.

So how should (and can) you, as a nursery operator, react if a member of staff:

  • complains about a parent or a child, by name, on Facebook but doesn’t mention the name of the setting or identify you as the operator?
  • participates in an offensive chain mail from their home computer, which contains racist and sexist comments and which ends up on your work computer system?
  • comments on consultations on workplace reorganisations on a Facebook page created for the purpose?

All of these have parallels in actual cases that have come before Employment Tribunals:

  • a pub manager was subjected to abusive behaviour by two customers, whom she asked to leave. She was then subjected to three abusive phone calls, from the customers' daughter, using insulting language. Having dealt with these situations professionally, the manger complained about the customers, by name, on Facebook while working. She did not mention the name of her employers or the pub
  • an employee sent an offensive email from his home computer to a colleague’s home computer. The email was a chain email headed 'It’s your duty to pass this on!' and contained material of a racist and sexist nature. As a result of sending this email to his colleague, it entered the employer’s computer system
  • an employee off work due to stress attended consultation meetings regarding workplace reorganisation. The employee was aware that such meetings were confidential until all consultation had been completed. Feeling that the company’s website did not provide an unrestricted forum for debate among employees, and following the completion of the group consultation process, the employee created a page on Facebook. After noting the company’s policy on social networking sites, the employee removed the Facebook page.

All of these circumstances resulted in the individual in question being dismissed. However, in the last example the Employment Tribunal held the dismissal to be unfair.

The employee who created the Facebook page had six years service and a clean disciplinary record. The Tribunal held that no reasonable employer could have concluded that dismissal was the appropriate sanction, particularly given that he had apologised for his actions and removed the offending page as soon as he realised it was grounds for disciplinary action. The employee was awarded £11,350 in compensation.

action points

  • Ensure you have an IT policy that includes the use of social networking sites and clearly communicates your expectations in relation to these sites and, in particular, where disciplinary action/dismissal may result.
  • Educate employees by making them aware of the impact that their actions could have.
  • Be reasonable when deciding the sanction you impose.
For more information, contact Mary Chant, partner and head of Blake Lapthorn solicitors' Health and Care group in Southampton on mary.chant@bllaw.co.uk or call 023 8085 7043.