called up for the Olympics
By calling out 13,500 military troops to provide security at the
Olympics, Parliament is almost doubling its previous estimation. A
number of these troops will be drafted from the reserve forces.
There are different types of reservists, but most likely it will be
members of voluntary reserve forces such as the Territorial Army
affected by the mobilisation order. The large majority of reserve
forces have full time employment, which therefore raises some
pertinent employment issues.
The recent call-out notice for the Olympics follows a recent
amendment to the law[1] allowing reservists to be called out when
there is 'urgent work of national importance'. Prior to this,
reservists could be called out for:
- national danger, great emergency or attack on the UK
- warlike operations or
- humanitarian/natural disasters.
This amendment significantly widens the scope of when reservists
can be deployed.
The study 'Future Reservists 2022' envisaged the amendment will
enable the use of reservists to assist during extreme weather,
accidents or security incidents; and to support high profile
national events, such as the Olympics.
The increase in use of reserve forces means employers and
employees need to know their rights and obligations when a call-out
notice is received. What follows are the options available.
1. object
The employer, if an employee's absence will mean serious harm to
the business or a related business, has a right to seek exemption,
deferral or revocation. To do this, the employer must apply to the
person specified in the call-out notice within seven days of notice
being received. If dissatisfied, the employer can apply to a
Reserve Forces Appeals Tribunal.
The reservist may also object by following the same procedure if
they have primary parental or care responsibilities; are engaged in
full time education; are self-employed and their deployment would
seriously harm business; or for some other compassionate
reason.
2. contract of employment ceases and is re-instated upon
reservist's return
The law surrounding what happens to an employee's contract of
employment whilst they are on deployment is uncertain. The Reserve
Forces (Safeguard of Employment) Act 1985 (RF(SE)A) protects
reservists in two ways. Firstly, it is illegal to dismiss a
reservist because of their reservist status. An employer could face
criminal penalties for doing so.
Secondly, the reservist's job role is safeguarded during
deployment. Wording in the act such as 're-instatement' and 'former
employer' implies that the contract of employment is terminated on
deployment and re-instated once the reservist returns. This is
important as it dictates what rights and obligations remain during
deployment.
The RF(SE)A places an obligation on the employer to re-instate
the reservist to the same or 'most favourable' job role and on the
same or 'most favourable' terms and conditions. This obligation
lasts for either 13, 26 or 52 weeks after re-instatement depending
on the length of service of the reservist before deployment. This
is an onerous obligation on the employer but a strong protection
for the employee.
The rights and obligations under the contract of employment do
not continue during deployment. The reservist's right to return to
the job is protected with continuity of employment preserved, but
as such there is no right to accrual of annual leave or other such
benefits. This Act applies even if the reservist is on a short term
call-out for example providing security at the Olympics.
3. the contract of employment continues whilst the reservist is
deployed
By continuing the contract, the employer does not have the same
obligations under the RF(SE)A. If the contract of employment is
ongoing but the reservist is made redundant whilst still away, the
reservist can still apply for re-instatement under the RF(SE)A on
their return.
If the contract of employment does continue while the reservist
has been deployed, benefits such as holiday pay and continuity of
employment will continue to accrue. Subject to terms and
conditions, benefits such as permanent health insurance and death
in service policies may also continue, which are risky if the
reservist is deployed to a hostile environment. The benefits and
drawbacks for the employee are the reverse to that of the
employer.
practical considerations
The law is unclear and it is therefore important to have an
unambiguous reservist policy in place. This is especially true
following the widening of power to call-out reservists. The legal
uncertainty stems from a lack of case law, which is unsurprising
since it would be taboo to dismiss a reservist who has just fought
for their country. Would this apply to a reservist away from work
to provide security for the Olympics?
Employing reservists is not all bad news for employers, whilst
on deployment or during training they acquire skills that are
valuable and transferable to a business. There are also ways for an
employer to obtain financial assistance when a reservist is
called-out.
notes
[1] Reserve Forces Act 1996 s.56 A inserted by s.28 Armed Forces
Act 2011