Insolvency Service issues guidance on extension of administration periods

 

insolvency and business recovery image

 

Many readers will already have read issue 37 of the 'Dear IP' newsletter, which was published in October 2008.

 

In this newsletter, the Insolvency Service have issued guidance to insolvency practitioners on the practice of including a blanket resolution for the extension of an administration period in the administrator's proposals. In the Insolvency Service's view, such a practice runs contrary to the intention of paragraph 76(2)(b) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986.

 

The Insolvency Service accept that there will be occasions when it is apparent to a proposed administrator from the outset that the administration may need to run for more than a year (such as when the company has a large amount of book debts to collect). In these circumstances, the Insolvency Service does not object to the administrator seeking a resolution to enable him/her to extend the administration period. However, the practice that the Insolvency Service wishes to avert is the practice of including this sort of resolution into the administrator's proposals as a matter of course.

 

For more information on administrators proposals, please contact any member of our Insolvency and Business Recovery team.

 

in the Winter 2008 issue...
 

IBRT issues 'top tip' on use of section 15 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986

----

IBRT issues note on insolvency issues affecting the recruitment sector

----

IBRT offers new fixed fee service for lodging administration appointment papers in the High Court

----

Insolvency Service third quarter statistics published

----

Companies Court applies strict pari passu principle to section 176A, IA 1986 (case of Re Courts plc)

----

IBRT previews 'bankruptcy lite' or debt relief orders, which become available in April 2009

----

Companies Court further considers requirements of a twilight trust (case of BA Peters Plc)

----

High Court reafffirms receiver's wide discretion in sale of property cases (case of Bell -v- Long)

----

why the domestic practitioner can no longer afford to ignore the cross-border picture (cases of BCI Ltd -v- Henwood; McGrath -v- Riddell; and Cartesio Oktato)

----

High Court reconfirms trustees' right to charge occupation rent notwithstanding Stack v Dowden (case of French -v- Barcham)

----

Ombudsman warns local authorities against using bankruptcy for council tax enforcement (case of Ford -v- Wolverhampton City Council)

----

IBRT is further strengthened

----

IBRT issues client guide on provisions of Companies Act 2006 coming into force since October 2007 of interest to insolvency practitioners

----

office holders required to advertise insolvency procedure on company's website, letterhead, etc (Companies (Trading Disclosures) (Insolvency) Regulations 2008)

----

administrators held liable for the costs of a creditor's application to remove them from office (case of Coyne -v- DRC Distribution)

----

bad news for creditors of those subject to the proceeds of crime regime (case of Serious Fraud Office -v- Lexi Holdings Plc)

----

Court of Appeal creates more uncertainty for office holders who seek to make collective redundancies (case of Day -v- Haine)

----

recent advances made in the courts by insolvency practitioners and other authorities spells trouble for carousel fraudsters

----

Insolvency Service issues guidance on extension of administration periods

----

 
visit our archive