compulsory examination powers - as published in R3 Recovery (Sept 2010)

The powers of compulsory examination available to insolvency office-holders are underused, often for the wrong reasons. In this article, Mike Pavitt and Theo Anderton suggest ways in which these powers might be brushed off and brought to best effect in order to maximise recoveries. This article first appeared, in a reduced format, in the autumn 2010 edition of Recovery, the magazine of R3, the Association of Business Recovery Professionals, published by GTI Media.

This article will be of interest to qualified insolvency practitioners and their staff, creditors contemplating the appointment of an insolvency practitioner and the likelihood of a dividend resulting therefrom, and others affected by the use, or proposed use, of sections 236 or 366 Insolvency Act 1986.
 
View/download the reduced version as it appeared in Recovery here. Alternatively, read/download the unexpurgated version of the article, which includes the law behind the proposition that practitioners have nothing to fear from human rights arguments in this area.

For more information, please contact:

Adrian Owen, partner, South Coast and Oxford, on 023 8085 7445 or adrian.owen@bllaw.co.uk.

Theo Anderton, partner, London on 020 7814 6916 or theo.anderton@bllaw.co.uk

or any other members of the team.