time to act on forced marriages

family child

 

The Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007 comes into effect on 25 November 2008.  It arrives after almost ten years of discussion and debate about how prevalent the problem of forced marriage is within our society and how the issue is best addressed. 

 

Following the investigations of a specially formulated Working Group and a subsequent Government consultation in which women's groups and campaigners such as Southall Black Sisters and Karma Nirvana were approached for responses, it was decided that criminalising forced marriages was not the best approach. This conclusion was made on the basis that:

  • there was already sufficient legislation to deal with the criminal acts that were committed in connection with forced marriages, such as kidnap, false imprisonment or rape, and
  • victims would be reluctant to seek help if they thought that their relatives would end up with a criminal conviction

 

In November 2006, the issue arose again when the Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Bill was submitted as a Private Member’s Bill. The bill was supported by the Government and eventually passed as the Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007.

 

The Act will empower courts to make Forced Marriage Protection Orders (FMPO) to protect individuals who may be forced into marriage or have already been forced into marriages.  The provisions are very much based on the 'injunctions' for domestic violence that are currently available through the courts, with practically identical provisions for applications to be made without notice and for warrants of arrests to be attached and utilised in cases of non-compliance.

 

An interesting aspect of the Act is the ability for a "relevant third party" to apply as well as the victim themselves.  Regarding who this shall be, suggestions have included local authorities, concerned partners and other professionals such as teachers or lawyers who may come across potential victims, as well as a "new independent body" who may facilitate more applications being made without a fear of upsetting cultural sensitivities. 

 

Whilst many are pleased that action has been taken to deal with this 'human rights' issue, there has also been widespread criticism, particularly dealing with what the Act fails to do.  It omits any means of providing financial provision or compensation to victims, so what happens to those young financially dependant individuals who are suddenly shunned and disowned by their family for not 'complying for the sake of honour and respect'?  For those who are forced into a marriage, there is no means of dissolving or annulling the marriage with victims having to seek legal advice about their options for a divorce or an annulment.

 

Time will tell whether the Act will be a successful weapon against the issue of forced marriages. 

 

contact

 

For any additional information, please contact Irpreet Kaur Kohli, a solicitor in the Family team in the firm's London office on 020 7814 5411 or email irpreet.kohli@bllaw.co.uk.