intestacy changes - will you avoid them?

For the first time since 1993 a change to the provisions on intestacy has been brought into effect. The statutory rules apply where a person dies without having made a Will and lay down the entitlements for specific surviving relatives.

The change, which is effective for the estates of persons dying without a Will since 1 February 2009, increases the cash legacy for the surviving spouse or registered civil partner. After a period of consultations, this legacy has been increased from £125,000 to £250,000 where the deceased had children and from £250,000 to £450,000 where the deceased had no children.

The remaining provisions are unchanged so that the surviving spouse or registered civil partner will continue to receive personal effects and chattels owned by the deceased and, if he had children (regardless of their age), the right to the income only from one half of the residue (ie the remaining assets after the legacy). The children have the right to the second half of the residue. If there are no children but the deceased had surviving parents, siblings or children of predeceased siblings, then those surviving relatives will receive one half of the residue and the spouse or civil partner only has the right to the other half. Despite general public opinion, the surviving spouse only receives the whole of the estate where the deceased had no children and nobody in this second class of surviving relatives.

The increase in the spouse’s legacy is of course welcome and does give the spouse or civil partner extra protection but the intestacy provisions are still no substitute for making a Will to give effect to your wishes on your death.

The increase to the spouse’s legacy does not keep pace with inflation and there is no provision for it to be index linked. The increases are not in line with the increases in prices, and particularly house prices that have occurred since 1993 even taking into account the current state of the housing market.

No account is made for the significant changes in society and the rise in cohabitation that has occurred since the last changes in 1993.

The legacy, at any level, is not available to cohabiting partners and the other provisions only apply to blood relatives (including adopted children). A bereaved cohabitee has no entitlements at all to inherit under the intestacy provisions where there is no Will.

Where a cohabitee is bereaved and there are children of the relationship, the bereaved partner may be left in the unfortunate position of having to bring a legal action to obtain financial provision against the estate, and this would in effect be against the cohabitee’s own children and their right to inherit.

Further there is no provision available for step children of the deceased. If they are dependent on the deceased then it would be necessary for them to bring legal action against the estate which could effectively be against their own parent and step siblings.

The intestacy provisions may not apply to assets which are held in joint names. This may provide some relief but in the greater complexity of social relationships which are prevalent, many cohabiting couples, and some married couples do not hold their home in joint names and the family home may well be part of the estate subject to the intestacy rules. We will continue to see situations where the bereaved spouse or partner has no right to remain in their home. In addition for partners who are unmarried, Inheritance Tax may also be a liability to be met adding to the difficulties for the family.

Further consultations are to be carried out to ascertain if there is need for further change. These current changes are the result of a consultation process that began in 2005 and with the government’s recent abandonment of consultations relating to greater protection in property law for unmarried couples it seems unlikely that we will see any significant changes to the basic premise of the intestacy rules at any time in the near future.

Despite the welcome changes that are effective from 1 February 2009, a valid and effective Will is and remains necessary to ensure that the best provision is made for loved ones and the most advantageous tax position is considered in the arrangements that are put into place in a Will.

For further information or to talk to someone about a specific matter, please contact a team member in the office nearest you:

Rachel Brooks, partner and head of Private Client Services group in our Portsmouth office on 023 9228 2714 or rachel.brooks@bllaw.co.uk.

James Antoniou, partner in our Oxford office on 01865 254286 or james.antoniou@bllaw.co.uk.

Martyn Thurston, partner in our Southampton office on 023 8085 7364 or martyn.thurston@bllaw.co.uk.

Douglas Smith, partner in our London office on 020 7814 5438 or douglas.smith@bllaw.co.uk

Alternatively, email our general enquiries helpdesk on privateclientinfo@bllaw.co.uk.